Current:Home > ScamsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Wealth Nexus Pro
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-16 13:26:58
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Small twin
- Britain’s Labour opposition has won 2 big prizes in momentum-building special elections
- Lafayette Parish Schools elevate interim superintendent to post permanently
- AI chatbots are supposed to improve health care. But research says some are perpetuating racism
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Influencer Nelly Toledo Shares Leather Weather Favorites From Amazon
- This week on Sunday Morning (October 22)
- Spirit Airlines cancels dozens of flights to inspect some of its planes. Disruptions will last days
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Kenneth Chesebro takes last-minute plea deal in Georgia election interference case
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- The Challenge: USA Season 2 Champs Explain Why Survivor Players Keep Winning the Game
- Rescued American kestrel bird turns to painting after losing ability to fly
- Barbie no party? Union lists Halloween costumes prohibited for striking actors
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- 'Old Dads': How to watch comedian Bill Burr's directorial debut available now
- Major water main break that affected thousands in northern New York repaired
- He ordered a revolver, but UPS lost it. How many guns go missing in the mail each year?
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
Rep. Jim Jordan will try again for House gavel, but Republicans won’t back the hardline Trump ally
Israel pounds Gaza, evacuates town near Lebanon ahead of expected ground offensive against Hamas
Pink Postpones Additional Concert Dates Amid Battle With Respiratory Infection
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
'Flower Moon' author recounts the conspiracy to murder the Osage people
Jim Harbaugh popped again for alleged cheating. It's time to drop the self-righteous act.
Thomas’ tying homer, Moreno’s decisive hit send D-backs over Phillies 6-5, ties NLCS at 2 games